From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 128577 invoked by alias); 21 May 2015 15:02:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 128459 invoked by uid 48); 21 May 2015 15:02:20 -0000 From: "glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/65979] [4.9/5/6 Regression] [SH] Wrong code is generated with stage1 compiler Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 15:02:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg01806.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979 --- Comment #24 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #23) > Ouch. The peephole in problem was added at gcc-5 not at 4.9. The above > patch should fix the original conftest.c issue, but debien 4.9-16 problem > would be an another issue. Sorry for my confusion. I am partially to be blamed for that. I initially reported the gcc-5 issue here, then saw gcc-4.9 failed to build as well and then assumed both were the same problem. But in any case, I am super happy you guys are fixing this. I will be back in Japan in October, so if I have a chance to meet either of you, I owe you some beer/sake/wine etc :). Thanks!