public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/65979] [5/6 Regression] [SH] Wrong code is generated with stage1 compiler
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 23:11:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-65979-4-lQ0doTcu1m@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-65979-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979
Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] [SH] |[5/6 Regression] [SH] Wrong
|Wrong code is generated |code is generated with
|with stage1 compiler |stage1 compiler
--- Comment #32 from Kazumoto Kojima <kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #28)
I should have been more clear about these comparison messages.
Warning is warning and doesn't cause failure. gcc/cc1*-checksum.o
objects depend on the virtual addresses of executables. If
randomize-va-space feature of kernel on the target machine is used,
then stage2/3 cc1*-checksum.o differs without any compiler problem.
These differences are warned but aren't handled as errors for that reason.
It looks that the log for 4.8.4-2 includes
gcc/d/ctfeexpr.dmd.o differs
line just after its 'Bootstrap comparison failure!' line. It looks that
that is the cause of failure and is a differnt issue.
For the original PR, I've apply the fix on 5/6 in behalf of Oleg after
the regtest on trunk which has become possible because 66181 is fixed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-26 23:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-02 8:15 [Bug target/65979] New: internal compiler error: in make_edges, at tree-cfg.c:923 glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-05-02 8:15 ` [Bug target/65979] " glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-05-02 13:00 ` [Bug target/65979] Multiple issues in conftest.c prevent build on sh4-linux-gnu kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-02 13:14 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-03 15:17 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-05-09 11:42 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-05-10 0:19 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-11 22:16 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-05-11 22:34 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-05-17 17:11 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-05-20 2:58 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-20 3:03 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-20 7:04 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-20 7:58 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-20 10:01 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-20 11:15 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-05-20 20:31 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-21 10:25 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-21 10:47 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-21 12:03 ` [Bug target/65979] [4.9/5/6 Regression] [SH] Wrong code is generated with stage1 compiler kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-21 13:37 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-21 15:02 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-05-21 21:08 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-21 22:21 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-25 11:31 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-05-26 10:01 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-26 22:32 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-26 22:37 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-26 23:11 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-05-27 11:27 ` [Bug target/65979] [5/6 " glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-05-27 12:12 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-24 12:37 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-24 13:41 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-24 23:59 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-25 10:10 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-25 12:04 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-06-25 13:58 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-25 22:30 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-25 23:12 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-25 23:58 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 0:18 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-27 0:47 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-26 5:12 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-26 16:36 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-07-27 3:53 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-65979-4-lQ0doTcu1m@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).