From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485366-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 98825 invoked by alias); 4 May 2015 11:28:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98788 invoked by uid 48); 4 May 2015 11:28:27 -0000
From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/65985] [5/6 Regression] compiler segfault with assert() in constexpr constructor body
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 11:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: DUPLICATE
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.2
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65985-4-nGd3ORzOZ7@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65985-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65985-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00206.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D65985

--- Comment #4 from Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot =
com> ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> Actually I think it's a dup.

Can we nonetheless ensure that the assert example would become a test case?
>>From gcc-bugs-return-485367-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon May 04 11:32:16 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-485367-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 130019 invoked by alias); 4 May 2015 11:32:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 129972 invoked by uid 48); 4 May 2015 11:32:13 -0000
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/65973] [5/6 Regression] segmentation fault when compiling C++14 code
Date: Mon, 04 May 2015 11:32:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65973-4-8c3aDVs4TE@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65973-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65973-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg00207.txt.bz2
Content-length: 185

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65973

--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
When fixing this, remember to also add the testcase in PR65985.