From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18962 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2015 10:04:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18888 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jul 2015 10:04:01 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug bootstrap/65988] Trying to compile GCC 5.1 in my (customized) Solaris 10/x86-64 fails with GMP errors Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 10:04:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00135.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D65988 Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez --- (In reply to Jesus Cea from comment #5) > Could you possibly tell me how to do it and what the impact would be? I think it should just work if you follow the instructions here: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/InstallingGCC but using: GRAPHITE_LOOP_OPT=3Dno >>From gcc-bugs-return-491246-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jul 02 10:19:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 88746 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2015 10:19:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 88712 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jul 2015 10:19:35 -0000 From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/65944] [5/6 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/pr65276: undefined reference to std2::exception::~exception() Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 10:19:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.2 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00136.txt.bz2 Content-length: 304 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D65944 --- Comment #7 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #6) > Since this fix, I am observing this regression on arm* targets: Please see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-06/msg01240.html >>From gcc-bugs-return-491247-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jul 02 10:31:19 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 50497 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2015 10:31:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 50462 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jul 2015 10:31:15 -0000 From: "amker at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/66612] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/20050830-1.c scan-assembler bdn Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 10:31:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: amker at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00137.txt.bz2 Content-length: 332 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66612 --- Comment #4 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #3) > stwx 10,8,9 -> *(int*)(r8+r9)=r10 I am wondering how should we handle this failure. Create a new doloop test and change this one testing the optimization gcc does now? Thanks, bin