public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/66000] New: Suggestion: more than one "not declared in this scope" per line
@ 2015-05-04 1:19 darlingm at gmail dot com
2015-05-12 13:05 ` [Bug c/66000] " egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: darlingm at gmail dot com @ 2015-05-04 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66000
Bug ID: 66000
Summary: Suggestion: more than one "not declared in this scope"
per line
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: darlingm at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
With the code
nonExistantClass varName = nonExistantFunction();
gcc 5.1.0 gives
error: `nonExistantClass' was not declared in this scope
nonExistantClass varName = nonExistantFunction();
^
It might be better if it ALSO gave:
error: `nonExistantFunction' was not declared in this scope
nonExistantClass varName = nonExistantFunction();
^
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* [Bug c/66000] Suggestion: more than one "not declared in this scope" per line
2015-05-04 1:19 [Bug c/66000] New: Suggestion: more than one "not declared in this scope" per line darlingm at gmail dot com
@ 2015-05-12 13:05 ` egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu @ 2015-05-12 13:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66000
Eric Gallager <egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager <egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu> ---
(In reply to Michael Darling from comment #0)
> With the code
> nonExistantClass varName = nonExistantFunction();
>
> gcc 5.1.0 gives
> error: `nonExistantClass' was not declared in this scope
> nonExistantClass varName = nonExistantFunction();
> ^
>
> It might be better if it ALSO gave:
> error: `nonExistantFunction' was not declared in this scope
> nonExistantClass varName = nonExistantFunction();
> ^
idk, this might lengthen the error output considerably for files with a lot of
undeclared identifiers in them...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-05-12 13:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-05-04 1:19 [Bug c/66000] New: Suggestion: more than one "not declared in this scope" per line darlingm at gmail dot com
2015-05-12 13:05 ` [Bug c/66000] " egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).