public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ramana at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/66049] Few AArch64 extend and add with shift tests generates sub optimal code with trunk gcc 6.0.
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 14:35:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-66049-4-gTCIYYidk9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-66049-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66049

Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to vekumar from comment #4)
> (In reply to ktkachov from comment #3)
> > Venkat, are you planning to submit this patch to gcc-patches?
> > Also, does this mean we can remove the patterns that do arith+shift using
> > MULT rtxes? (like *adds_<optab><mode>_multp2)
> 
> Hi Kyrill, 
> 
> Yes I am planing to submit the patch. But before that I need to test by
> putting some assert and check if *adds_<optab><mode>_multp2 and similar
> patterns are not used anymore.

So this is a regression on GCC 6. what's holding up pushing this patch onto
gcc-patches@ ?


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-05-15 14:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-07 12:35 [Bug target/66049] New: " vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-08 16:33 ` [Bug target/66049] " ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-12  8:16 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-15 14:35 ` ramana at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-05-15 15:38 ` [Bug target/66049] [6 regression] " vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-18 17:29 ` vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-19  9:27 ` ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-26 15:32 ` vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-26 16:24 ` vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-66049-4-gTCIYYidk9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).