From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7F2533858C53; Thu,  8 Feb 2024 12:46:27 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7F2533858C53
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1707396387;
	bh=amYGWhQaR/QiWyjukK6Zw2HciNBSlcmfoIA7s8wsxWQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=QZJFQxM8UhlevjvTzPd9/DoXRwymSrAlP5K8ctZg9pjDLnQ/C9GJdhUeoSIb9s2Qo
	 2YgTPkHWVg2dTFFN4AWHz6kYwtV3qzxU1AYUNTupWHT+OR0X1Zgay9wG6XEuIOWTxw
	 UjOzBefcVVn3o1qLAjQwpdr46eUavw138co0vF8Q=
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/66095] Unexpected __gnu_cxx::__concurrence_lock_error
 with _GLIBCXX_DEBUG
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 12:46:26 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: WORKSFORME
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-66095-4-uJXVncg6di@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66095-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66095-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D66095

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I can't reproduce this with current trunk and mingw-w64.=