From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 0E2A73858C00; Fri,  2 Dec 2022 01:25:17 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 0E2A73858C00
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1669944318;
	bh=bz/FGbk8ZU6l/a6hdH76vNrtZeBLuVQU6kejb3UTTeg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=R8grwURoxbC1hd7RQDlSba3vM1HAvfhwfo+n8dLHDJ3DS8+mp/WEa1zmTt14NiFMy
	 QoqhV6QIsmwQXiBZ6MWx1nSEl5AbH75YV7+ZrQ0O7ycn9Q9p+avUekG7lnt2vGLo6z
	 dPRIiYacdgdPX73xGZCfKjaRI7S/uTC3TNSCR3fQ=
From: "lh_mouse at 126 dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/66146] call_once not C++11-compliant on ppc64le
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 01:25:14 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: lh_mouse at 126 dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-66146-4-cLAiAuqG33@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66146-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66146-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D66146

LIU Hao <lh_mouse at 126 dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |lh_mouse at 126 dot com

--- Comment #53 from LIU Hao <lh_mouse at 126 dot com> ---
Why not implement `call_once` with `__cxa_guard_{acquire,release,abort}`?

It's basically

  ```
  template<typename _Callable, typename... _Args>
  void
  call_once(once_flag& __once, _Callable&& __callable, _Args&&... __args)
    {
      int __r =3D ::__cxa_guard_acquire(&__once);
      if(__r =3D=3D 0)
        return;  // passive

      __try {
        _INVOKE(forward<_Callable>(__callable), forward<_Args>(__args)...);
      }
      __catch(...) {
        ::__cxa_guard_abort(&__once);  // exceptional
        __throw_exception_again;
      }
      ::__cxa_guard_release(&__once);  // returning
    }
  ```=