From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18562 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2015 16:49:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 7614 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jun 2015 16:49:04 -0000 From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/66162] segfault on code using controlled types in -gnatc mode Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 16:49:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ada X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00188.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D66162 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- > In PR64866 comment 2, Arno said "Visibility in the Ada runtime do not fol= low > standard Ada rules. In other words, the Ada runtime isn't implemented in > Ada, but in a different dialect very close to Ada, with additional > restrictions.=E2=80=9D >=20 > He notes two of the additional restrictions: is there a writeup anywhere = of > the language restrictions and usage restrictions like this one? I don't really know, I'm not a specialist of the runtime at all. >>From gcc-bugs-return-487857-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Jun 02 16:57:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 81809 invoked by alias); 2 Jun 2015 16:57:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 81310 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jun 2015 16:57:34 -0000 From: "simon at pushface dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/64866] Lost visibility of package Interfaces after task or PO declaration Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 16:57:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ada X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: simon at pushface dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00189.txt.bz2 Content-length: 416 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64866 --- Comment #5 from simon at pushface dot org --- (In reply to Arnaud Charlet from comment #2) > Visibility in the Ada runtime do not follow standard Ada rules. In other > words, the Ada runtime isn't implemented in Ada, but in a different > dialect very close to Ada, with additional restrictions. Are these additional restrictions documented anywhere, please?