From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 33850 invoked by alias); 20 May 2015 00:06:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 33790 invoked by uid 48); 20 May 2015 00:06:25 -0000 From: "bruno.manga95 at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/66210] New: Variable template specialization does not work with alias-declarations Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 00:06:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: bruno.manga95 at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg01577.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66210 Bug ID: 66210 Summary: Variable template specialization does not work with alias-declarations Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: bruno.manga95 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 35571 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35571&action=edit testcase In code such as the following, alias-declarations causes a variable to be instantatiated from the non-specialized variable template using resultType = const char*; template T pi = (T)(3.1415926535897932385); template<> resultType pi = "pi"; NOTE: using a typedef does not generate the same error and the code compiles