public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/66211] New: Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error
@ 2015-05-20 3:58 vgheorgh at gmail dot com
2015-05-20 7:07 ` [Bug c++/66211] [5/6 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 more replies)
0 siblings, 9 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: vgheorgh at gmail dot com @ 2015-05-20 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66211
Bug ID: 66211
Summary: Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal
compiler error
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vgheorgh at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The code below
void f(int&){}
int main()
{
int x = 0;
double y = 1;
f(1 > 0 ? x : y);
}
should not compile, due to rvalue conversion in the ternary operator, then
trying to bind the rvalue to a non-constant reference. However, gcc51 and gcc6
HEAD crash with an internal compiler error
internal compiler error: in convert_like_real, at cp/call.c:6471
gcc49 works (emits an error)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/66211] [5/6 Regression] Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error
2015-05-20 3:58 [Bug c++/66211] New: Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error vgheorgh at gmail dot com
@ 2015-05-20 7:07 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-20 7:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-20 7:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66211
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-05-20
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |5.2
Summary|Rvalue conversion in |[5/6 Regression] Rvalue
|ternary operator causes |conversion in ternary
|internal compiler error |operator causes internal
| |compiler error
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Started with r217279.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/66211] [5/6 Regression] Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error
2015-05-20 3:58 [Bug c++/66211] New: Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error vgheorgh at gmail dot com
2015-05-20 7:07 ` [Bug c++/66211] [5/6 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-20 7:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-20 8:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-20 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66211
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I will have a look.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/66211] [5/6 Regression] Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error
2015-05-20 3:58 [Bug c++/66211] New: Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error vgheorgh at gmail dot com
2015-05-20 7:07 ` [Bug c++/66211] [5/6 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-20 7:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-20 8:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-20 13:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-20 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66211
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So we fold (and did fold before) 1 > 0 ? x : y to (float) x (thus an rvalue).
Then later we call ocp_convert on that requesting a conversion to int which
does
810 converted = fold_if_not_in_template (convert_to_integer (type,
e));
where convert_to_integer ends up just doing
910 return build1 (FIX_TRUNC_EXPR, type, expr);
and fold then applying the simplification
/* If we are converting an integer to a floating-point that can
represent it exactly and back to an integer, we can skip the
floating-point conversion. */
(if (inside_int && inter_float && final_int &&
(unsigned) significand_size (TYPE_MODE (inter_type))
>= inside_prec - !inside_unsignedp)
(convert @0))))))
and
(for cvt (convert view_convert float fix_trunc)
(simplify
(cvt @0)
(if ((GIMPLE && useless_type_conversion_p (type, TREE_TYPE (@0)))
|| (GENERIC && type == TREE_TYPE (@0)))
@0)))
where wrapping the result as (non_lvalue @0) fixes the regression. The bug
is of course the C++ frontend folding stuff too early (and too aggressive)
here.
But for GCC 5 the above might be a good-enough workaround (eventually
we can conditionalize building non_lvalue exprs to non-C-frontends).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/66211] [5/6 Regression] Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error
2015-05-20 3:58 [Bug c++/66211] New: Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error vgheorgh at gmail dot com
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-20 8:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-20 13:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-20 13:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-20 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66211
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jason at redhat dot com
Version|unknown |5.1.0
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Unfortunately this causes
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/foldcast-1.c scan-tree-dump-times original "return x;" 2
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr31261.c scan-tree-dump-times original "return b & 7;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times original
"sub_
scalar .\\\\(struct t1 .\\\\) array_class_t1_ptr._data.dat" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O1 scan-tree-dump-times original
"sub_
scalar .\\\\(struct t1 .\\\\) array_class_t1_ptr._data.dat" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O2 scan-tree-dump-times original
"sub_
scalar .\\\\(struct t1 .\\\\) array_class_t1_ptr._data.dat" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
scan-tree-dump
-times original "sub_scalar .\\\\(struct t1 .\\\\)
array_class_t1_ptr._data.dat"
1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loo
ps -finline-functions scan-tree-dump-times original "sub_scalar .\\\\(struct
t
1 .\\\\) array_class_t1_ptr._data.dat" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
scan-tree-dump-times original "sub_scalar .\\\\(struct t1 .\\\\)
array_class_t1
_ptr._data.dat" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O3 -g scan-tree-dump-times original
"s
ub_scalar .\\\\(struct t1 .\\\\) array_class_t1_ptr._data.dat" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -Os scan-tree-dump-times original
"sub_
scalar .\\\\(struct t1 .\\\\) array_class_t1_ptr._data.dat" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_f_pointer_tests_3.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original
"
fptr_array.data = cptr;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_loc_test_22.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original
"D.[0-9
]+ = parm.[0-9]+.data;[^;]+ptr[1-4] = D.[0-9]+;" 4
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_14.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times original
"fgsl
_file.[0-9]+.gsl_file = c_ptr.[0-9]+;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_14.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times original
"fgsl
_file.[0-9]+.gsl_func = c_funptr.[0-9]+;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_14.f90 -O1 scan-tree-dump-times original
"fgsl
_file.[0-9]+.gsl_file = c_ptr.[0-9]+;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_14.f90 -O1 scan-tree-dump-times original
"fgsl
_file.[0-9]+.gsl_func = c_funptr.[0-9]+;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_14.f90 -O2 scan-tree-dump-times original
"fgsl
_file.[0-9]+.gsl_file = c_ptr.[0-9]+;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_14.f90 -O2 scan-tree-dump-times original
"fgsl
_file.[0-9]+.gsl_func = c_funptr.[0-9]+;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_14.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
scan-tree-dump
-times original "fgsl_file.[0-9]+.gsl_file = c_ptr.[0-9]+;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_14.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
scan-tree-dump
-times original "fgsl_file.[0-9]+.gsl_func = c_funptr.[0-9]+;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_14.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loo
ps -finline-functions scan-tree-dump-times original
"fgsl_file.[0-9]+.gsl_file
= c_ptr.[0-9]+;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_14.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loo
ps -finline-functions scan-tree-dump-times original
"fgsl_file.[0-9]+.gsl_func
= c_funptr.[0-9]+;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_14.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
scan-tree-dump-times original "fgsl_file.[0-9]+.gsl_file = c_ptr.[0-9]+;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_14.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
scan-tree-dump-times original "fgsl_file.[0-9]+.gsl_func = c_funptr.[0-9]+;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_14.f90 -O3 -g scan-tree-dump-times original
"f
gsl_file.[0-9]+.gsl_file = c_ptr.[0-9]+;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_14.f90 -O3 -g scan-tree-dump-times original
"f
gsl_file.[0-9]+.gsl_func = c_funptr.[0-9]+;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_14.f90 -Os scan-tree-dump-times original
"fgsl
_file.[0-9]+.gsl_file = c_ptr.[0-9]+;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_14.f90 -Os scan-tree-dump-times original
"fgsl
_file.[0-9]+.gsl_func = c_funptr.[0-9]+;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_15.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original
"fgsl_
file.[0-9]+.gsl_file = c_ptr.[0-9]+;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/c_ptr_tests_15.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-times original
"fgsl_
file.[0-9]+.gsl_func = c_funptr.[0-9]+;" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_31.f90 -O scan-tree-dump original
"a.y.d._data.dat
a = D.[0-9]+.y.d._data.data;"
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_31.f90 -O scan-tree-dump original "a.y.x.data =
D.
[0-9]+.y.x.data;"
FAIL: gfortran.dg/coarray_31.f90 -O scan-tree-dump original
"a.y.z._data.dat
a = D.[0-9]+.y.z._data.data;"
FAIL: gfortran.dg/no_arg_check_2.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times original
"sub_
scalar .\\\\(struct t1 .\\\\) array_class_t1_ptr._data.dat" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/no_arg_check_2.f90 -O1 scan-tree-dump-times original
"sub_
scalar .\\\\(struct t1 .\\\\) array_class_t1_ptr._data.dat" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/no_arg_check_2.f90 -O2 scan-tree-dump-times original
"sub_
scalar .\\\\(struct t1 .\\\\) array_class_t1_ptr._data.dat" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/no_arg_check_2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
scan-tree-dump
-times original "sub_scalar .\\\\(struct t1 .\\\\)
array_class_t1_ptr._data.dat"
1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/no_arg_check_2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
-funroll-all-loo
ps -finline-functions scan-tree-dump-times original "sub_scalar .\\\\(struct
t
1 .\\\\) array_class_t1_ptr._data.dat" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/no_arg_check_2.f90 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
scan-tree-dump-times original "sub_scalar .\\\\(struct t1 .\\\\)
array_class_t1
_ptr._data.dat" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/no_arg_check_2.f90 -O3 -g scan-tree-dump-times original
"s
ub_scalar .\\\\(struct t1 .\\\\) array_class_t1_ptr._data.dat" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/no_arg_check_2.f90 -Os scan-tree-dump-times original
"sub_
scalar .\\\\(struct t1 .\\\\) array_class_t1_ptr._data.dat" 1
FAIL: gnat.dg/ice_type.adb (test for excess errors) (ICE in build_binary_op, at
ada/gcc-interface/utils2.c:906)
FAIL: gnat.dg/specs/addr1.ads (test for warnings, line 30)
not yet further analyzed.
IMHO the C++ frontend shouldn't rely on fold preserving rvalue-ness but it
should perform these checks before folding like the C frontend does.
I'll look at the above failures later this week to see if there is anything
obvious that can be improved.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/66211] [5/6 Regression] Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error
2015-05-20 3:58 [Bug c++/66211] New: Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error vgheorgh at gmail dot com
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-20 13:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-20 13:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-21 13:24 ` [Bug c++/66211] [5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-20 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66211
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Perhaps just guard this particular match.pd pattern with GIMPLE guard for now
(until the delayed C++ folding is committed)?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/66211] [5 Regression] Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error
2015-05-20 3:58 [Bug c++/66211] New: Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error vgheorgh at gmail dot com
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-21 13:24 ` [Bug c++/66211] [5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-21 13:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-03 7:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-03 7:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-21 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66211
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |6.0
Summary|[5/6 Regression] Rvalue |[5 Regression] Rvalue
|conversion in ternary |conversion in ternary
|operator causes internal |operator causes internal
|compiler error |compiler error
Known to fail| |5.1.0
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on trunk sofar.
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu May 21 13:23:41 2015
New Revision: 223483
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=223483&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-05-21 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR c++/66211
* match.pd: Guard pattern optimzing (int)(float)int
conversions to apply only on GIMPLE.
* g++.dg/conversion/pr66211.C: New testcase.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-18.c: Adjust.
Added:
trunk/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/conversion/pr66211.C
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/match.pd
trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-18.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/66211] [5 Regression] Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error
2015-05-20 3:58 [Bug c++/66211] New: Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error vgheorgh at gmail dot com
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-20 13:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-05-21 13:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-21 13:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-05-21 13:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66211
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to work| |6.0
Summary|[5/6 Regression] Rvalue |[5 Regression] Rvalue
|conversion in ternary |conversion in ternary
|operator causes internal |operator causes internal
|compiler error |compiler error
Known to fail| |5.1.0
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on trunk sofar.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/66211] [5 Regression] Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error
2015-05-20 3:58 [Bug c++/66211] New: Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error vgheorgh at gmail dot com
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2015-05-21 13:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-03 7:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-03 7:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-03 7:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66211
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jun 3 07:39:06 2015
New Revision: 224059
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224059&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-03 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
Backport from mainline
2015-06-02 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR debug/65549
* dwarf2out.c (lookup_context_die): New function.
(resolve_addr): Avoid forcing a full DIE for the
target of a DW_TAG_GNU_call_site during late compilation.
Instead create a stub DIE without a type if we have a
context DIE present.
* g++.dg/lto/pr65549_0.C: New testcase.
2015-06-01 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/66280
* tree-vect-slp.c (vect_detect_hybrid_slp_stmts): Fix pattern
def-use walking.
* g++.dg/torture/pr66280.C: New testcase.
* g++.dg/torture/pr66280-2.C: Likewise.
2015-05-27 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/66272
Revert parts of
2014-08-15 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/62031
* tree-data-ref.c (dr_analyze_indices): Do not set
DR_UNCONSTRAINED_BASE.
(dr_may_alias_p): All indirect accesses have to go the
formerly DR_UNCONSTRAINED_BASE path.
* tree-data-ref.h (struct indices): Remove
unconstrained_base member.
(DR_UNCONSTRAINED_BASE): Remove.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr66272.c: New testcase.
2015-05-21 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR c++/66211
* match.pd: Guard pattern optimzing (int)(float)int
conversions to apply only on GIMPLE.
* g++.dg/conversion/pr66211.C: New testcase.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-18.c: Adjust.
2015-05-13 Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
PR tree-optimization/66123
* tree-ssa-dom.c (propagate_rhs_into_lhs): Check if we found
a taken edge.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr66123.c: New testcase.
Added:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/conversion/pr66211.C
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr65549_0.C
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr66280-2.C
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/pr66280.C
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr66123.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/pr66272.c
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/dwarf2out.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/match.pd
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/forwprop-18.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/tree-data-ref.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/tree-data-ref.h
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/tree-ssa-dom.c
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/tree-vect-slp.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/66211] [5 Regression] Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error
2015-05-20 3:58 [Bug c++/66211] New: Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error vgheorgh at gmail dot com
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-03 7:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-03 7:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-03 7:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66211
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Known to work| |5.2.0
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-06-03 7:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-05-20 3:58 [Bug c++/66211] New: Rvalue conversion in ternary operator causes internal compiler error vgheorgh at gmail dot com
2015-05-20 7:07 ` [Bug c++/66211] [5/6 Regression] " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-20 7:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-20 8:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-20 13:04 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-20 13:12 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-21 13:24 ` [Bug c++/66211] [5 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-05-21 13:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-03 7:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-03 7:41 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).