From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-486805-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 22729 invoked by alias); 20 May 2015 13:19:14 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 22118 invoked by uid 48); 20 May 2015 13:19:07 -0000
From: "sirl at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/66220] New: -Wmisleading-indentation false/inconsistent warning
Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 13:19:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: sirl at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-66220-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg01645.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66220

            Bug ID: 66220
           Summary: -Wmisleading-indentation false/inconsistent warning
           Product: gcc
           Version: 6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: c
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: sirl at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 35578
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35578&action=edit
Testcase to reproduce

The following indenting style generates a false warning:

int test1(int v)
{
    int res = 28;

    if (v == 2)
    {
        res = 27;
    } else
    {
        res = 18;
    }
    return res;
}

test-indent.c: In function 'test1':
test-indent.c:13:5: warning: statement is indented as if it were guarded by...
[-Wmisleading-indentation]
     return res;
      ^
test-indent.c:9:7: note: ...this 'else' clause, but it is not
     } else
        ^

Even though I don't like this style, I don't think it's misleading.
If you change the 'else' to 'else if ()' the warning goes away, that's why
think it's at least inconsistent.