From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 67197 invoked by alias); 27 May 2015 18:25:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 67143 invoked by uid 48); 27 May 2015 18:25:36 -0000 From: "glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/66312] New: [SH] Regression: Bootstrap failure gcc/d/ctfeexpr.dmd.o differs with gcc-4.8/4.9 Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 18:25:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.3 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone cf_gcctarget Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-05/txt/msg02267.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66312 Bug ID: 66312 Summary: [SH] Regression: Bootstrap failure gcc/d/ctfeexpr.dmd.o differs with gcc-4.8/4.9 Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de CC: kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org, olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: sh*-*-* Hello! As previously stated in [1], filing a new bug report for the gcc-4.8/4.9 bootstrap failure which was introduced recently. As Kaz already pointed out, the failing reason is most certainly: > gcc/d/ctfeexpr.dmd.o differs Build logs: gcc-4.8: http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-4.8&arch=sh4&ver=4.8.4-2&stamp=1432515052 gcc-4.9: http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gcc-4.9&arch=sh4&ver=4.9.2-18&stamp=1432566734 Unfortunately, Matthias Klose doesn't split the patches in his SVN snapshots, so I'm not sure how to properly bisect the problem. Any suggestions welcome. The regression must have come through any of these changes [2]. > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979#c35 > [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65979#c8