public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/66318] Error messages contain raw file name; malicious #line directives can do bad things Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 03:20:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-66318-4-s0Y9JOGwQT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-66318-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66318 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> --- You're right that the text of diagnostics is outside the scope of the C standard. But as you note, even diagnostics are relied on by tools to manipulate the referenced files, and changing the file names in the compiler output would break such tools. For example, in Emacs Compilation Mode (http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/manual/html_node/emacs/Compilation-Mode.html) if diagnostics in a file named "beep\a.c" were introduced by the string "beep<BEL>.c:" instead, Emacs would no longer be able to open the file. On the other hand, "beep\a.c" seems like a corner case not worth worrying about, and since most multibyte encodings (with the exception of ISO 10646) seem to take care to avoid using control characters for the second and subsequent bytes, maybe the impact of such filtering wouldn't be as bad as might at first seem, especially if an option were provided to disable the filtering. David Wheeler presents some good arguments in favor of restricting the set of valid file name characters in his paper on Fixing Unix/Linux/POSIX Filenames: http://www.dwheeler.com/essays/fixing-unix-linux-filenames.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-28 3:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-05-27 23:01 [Bug preprocessor/66318] New: " Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com 2015-05-27 23:42 ` [Bug preprocessor/66318] " msebor at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-05-28 0:06 ` Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com 2015-05-28 3:20 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2015-05-28 23:38 ` miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-05-29 19:47 ` Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-66318-4-s0Y9JOGwQT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).