public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "marcus.kool at urlfilterdb dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/66369] gcc 4.8.3/5.1.0 miss optimisation with vpmovmskb Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 17:50:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-66369-4-UZc1heLnnx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-66369-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66369 --- Comment #8 from Marcus Kool <marcus.kool at urlfilterdb dot com> --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5) > Created attachment 35693 [details] > Patch to add zero-extended MOVMSK patterns > > This patch adds zero-extended MOVMSK patterns. > > However, one more cast from (int) to (unsigned int) is needed in the source, > due to the definition of the intrinsic: > > long v; > > regchx256 = _mm256_set1_epi8( ch ); > regset256 = _mm256_loadu_si256( (__m256i const *) set ); > v = (unsigned int) _mm256_movemask_epi8 > ( _mm256_cmpeq_epi8(regchx256,regset256) ); Can you confirm that the code has return __builtin_ctzl(v); Thanks for the patch, but the required cast to unsigned int is counter-intuitive and it is likely that nobody will use this cast in their code and hence miss the optimisation. Isn't there a more elegant solution? >From gcc-bugs-return-488114-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jun 04 17:59:17 2015 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-488114-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6067 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2015 17:59:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 5297 invoked by uid 48); 4 Jun 2015 17:59:13 -0000 From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/66369] gcc 4.8.3/5.1.0 miss optimisation with vpmovmskb Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 17:59:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.3 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: minor X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ubizjak at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: <bug-66369-4-8X2VHueJUZ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-66369-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-66369-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00446.txt.bz2 Content-length: 851 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66369 --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Marcus Kool from comment #8) > Can you confirm that the code has > return __builtin_ctzl(v); __inline__ long find_pos32( unsigned char ch, mycharset32 set ) { __m256i regchx256; __m256i regset256; long v; regchx256 = _mm256_set1_epi8( ch ); regset256 = _mm256_loadu_si256( (__m256i const *) set ); v = (unsigned int) _mm256_movemask_epi8( _mm256_cmpeq_epi8(regchx256,regset256) ); if (v != 0L) return (long) __builtin_ctzl( v ); return -1; } > Thanks for the patch, but the required cast to unsigned int is > counter-intuitive and it is likely that nobody will use this cast in their > code and hence miss the optimisation. Isn't there a more elegant solution? No. >From gcc-bugs-return-488115-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Jun 04 18:13:26 2015 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-488115-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 35887 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2015 18:13:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 35842 invoked by uid 48); 4 Jun 2015 18:13:22 -0000 From: "tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/58749] PACK(ADJUSTL([" a"," b"]), [.TRUE.,.FALSE.]) causes an internal compiler error Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2015 18:13:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc assigned_to Message-ID: <bug-58749-4-5cIJ20PNT8@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-58749-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-58749-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg00447.txt.bz2 Content-length: 600 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idX749 Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2013-10-16 00:00:00 |2015-6-4 CC| |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org> --- A missing charlen.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-04 17:50 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-06-01 21:53 [Bug c/66369] New: " marcus.kool at urlfilterdb dot com 2015-06-01 21:57 ` [Bug c/66369] " marcus.kool at urlfilterdb dot com 2015-06-02 9:05 ` [Bug target/66369] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-02 10:21 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2015-06-02 11:21 ` marcus.kool at urlfilterdb dot com 2015-06-02 14:51 ` marcus.kool at urlfilterdb dot com 2015-06-03 18:00 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2015-06-04 10:06 ` uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-04 10:11 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2015-06-04 17:50 ` marcus.kool at urlfilterdb dot com [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-66369-4-UZc1heLnnx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).