public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "romato.san1337 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/66425] (void) cast doesn't suppress __attribute__((warn_unused_result))
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2023 12:25:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-66425-4-hyJqUdTmwT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-66425-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425

--- Comment #57 from Roman Krotov <romato.san1337 at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Ed Catmur from comment #55)
> So this problem will resolve itself, over time.

But I don't see any reasons not to implement the switch right now...
Late is better than never.

> we can expect that attribute to be adopted where people intend that behavior
> as opposed to the
> warning not suppressible by cast to void

I see your point and I partially agree with it, but what about the projects
what don't agree with the distinction of these 2 attributes? Or just want to be
more compatible with clang?
Or they just may not agree with the choice of a library, that decided to put
wur instead of nodiscard for a specific function.
Something like -Wno-void-unused would still be better for them than
-Wno-unused-result, for the reasons in my previous comment.

(In reply to Martin Uecker from comment #56)
> works as expected and is supported for older language modes

Even if one day projects, that will prefer to stay on C99 or C11 and use
-Wpedantic (which warns about [[]] right now), will be able to use [[syntax]]
without any warning, they may still not like it. Even if gcc will include
nodiscard into the __attribute__ syntax, there, for sure, will be the libraries
that won't prefer to update or use the new attribute.
For these situations, or even if they **will** use the new attribute, see my
previous paragraph.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-10 12:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-05  0:38 [Bug c/66425] New: " rusty at rustcorp dot com.au
2015-06-05  7:21 ` [Bug c/66425] " manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-11  0:51 ` filbranden at google dot com
2015-06-11  5:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-11  5:52 ` koct9i at gmail dot com
2015-06-11  5:55 ` filbranden at google dot com
2015-06-11  6:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-11  6:37 ` filbranden at google dot com
2015-06-11  6:46 ` filbranden at google dot com
2015-06-11  6:49 ` lucas.de.marchi at gmail dot com
2015-06-11  8:41 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-11 14:10 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
2015-06-11 14:25 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-11 15:08 ` lucas.de.marchi at gmail dot com
2015-06-11 15:49 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com
2015-06-11 16:57 ` filbranden at google dot com
2015-06-14 17:29 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-20  5:35 ` rusty at rustcorp dot com.au
2015-08-20  6:05 ` filbranden at google dot com
2020-03-28 11:07 ` pskocik at gmail dot com
2021-07-27 19:33 ` ndesaulniers at google dot com
2023-04-22 21:20 ` achurch+gcc at achurch dot org
2023-04-23  7:07 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-23  7:53 ` achurch+gcc at achurch dot org
2023-04-23 20:00 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-23 21:51 ` achurch+gcc at achurch dot org
2023-04-23 22:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-23 23:06 ` achurch+gcc at achurch dot org
2023-04-24  6:45 ` rusty at rustcorp dot com.au
2023-04-24  8:21 ` achurch+gcc at achurch dot org
2023-04-24  8:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-24  8:35 ` fw at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-24  9:06 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-24  9:18 ` jengelh at inai dot de
2023-04-24  9:41 ` achurch+gcc at achurch dot org
2023-08-09 22:33 ` romato.san1337 at gmail dot com
2023-08-09 23:09 ` ed at catmur dot uk
2023-08-10  9:23 ` muecker at gwdg dot de
2023-08-10 12:25 ` romato.san1337 at gmail dot com [this message]
2023-08-10 18:12 ` ed at catmur dot uk
2023-08-17 13:09 ` romato.san1337 at gmail dot com
2023-09-06 11:07 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-09-06 11:51 ` achurch+gcc at achurch dot org
2024-02-14 11:32 ` groessler_christian at yahoo dot de

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-66425-4-hyJqUdTmwT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).