public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "filbranden at google dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/66425] (void) cast doesn't suppress __attribute__((warn_unused_result)) Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 05:55:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-66425-4-nBR0CUkMXe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-66425-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425 --- Comment #6 from Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden at google dot com> --- Then please explain to me how this: (void) foo(); is any worse than this: int ignored __attribute__((unused)); ignored = foo(); /* do nothing with ignored here */ You can force me to assign the return value to something, but you can't really force me to do something useful with it... In the cases above, I think the former is a much more clear way to express my intent to ignore that value, I'm telling the compiler "yeah, I know, I'm supposed to use this value, but in this particular case I really know what I'm doing so please bear with me here." The -Wunused-result warnings would be a lot more useful (or, actually, just useful) if I was able to whitelist the places where I want to ignore the values, since right now my only practical choice is to disable it completely with -Wno-unused-result. This is an example of a *real* problem that would have been caught by this warning: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25509#c28 And it's not just LLVM... Other linters and static analysis tools seem to agree that a (void) cast is an explicit indication that the coder meant to ignore those results, so why would gcc want to be the one exception here? Thanks! Filipe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-11 5:55 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-06-05 0:38 [Bug c/66425] New: " rusty at rustcorp dot com.au 2015-06-05 7:21 ` [Bug c/66425] " manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-11 0:51 ` filbranden at google dot com 2015-06-11 5:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-11 5:52 ` koct9i at gmail dot com 2015-06-11 5:55 ` filbranden at google dot com [this message] 2015-06-11 6:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-11 6:37 ` filbranden at google dot com 2015-06-11 6:46 ` filbranden at google dot com 2015-06-11 6:49 ` lucas.de.marchi at gmail dot com 2015-06-11 8:41 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-11 14:10 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org 2015-06-11 14:25 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-06-11 15:08 ` lucas.de.marchi at gmail dot com 2015-06-11 15:49 ` joseph at codesourcery dot com 2015-06-11 16:57 ` filbranden at google dot com 2015-06-14 17:29 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-08-20 5:35 ` rusty at rustcorp dot com.au 2015-08-20 6:05 ` filbranden at google dot com 2020-03-28 11:07 ` pskocik at gmail dot com 2021-07-27 19:33 ` ndesaulniers at google dot com 2023-04-22 21:20 ` achurch+gcc at achurch dot org 2023-04-23 7:07 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-23 7:53 ` achurch+gcc at achurch dot org 2023-04-23 20:00 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-23 21:51 ` achurch+gcc at achurch dot org 2023-04-23 22:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-23 23:06 ` achurch+gcc at achurch dot org 2023-04-24 6:45 ` rusty at rustcorp dot com.au 2023-04-24 8:21 ` achurch+gcc at achurch dot org 2023-04-24 8:26 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-24 8:35 ` fw at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-24 9:06 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-04-24 9:18 ` jengelh at inai dot de 2023-04-24 9:41 ` achurch+gcc at achurch dot org 2023-08-09 22:33 ` romato.san1337 at gmail dot com 2023-08-09 23:09 ` ed at catmur dot uk 2023-08-10 9:23 ` muecker at gwdg dot de 2023-08-10 12:25 ` romato.san1337 at gmail dot com 2023-08-10 18:12 ` ed at catmur dot uk 2023-08-17 13:09 ` romato.san1337 at gmail dot com 2023-09-06 11:07 ` segher at gcc dot gnu.org 2023-09-06 11:51 ` achurch+gcc at achurch dot org 2024-02-14 11:32 ` groessler_christian at yahoo dot de
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-66425-4-nBR0CUkMXe@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).