From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 81886 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2015 07:43:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 81829 invoked by uid 48); 22 Jun 2015 07:43:29 -0000 From: "thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/66483] [4.9 Regression] ICE (in add_stores, at var-tracking.c:6000) on arm-linux-gnueabihf Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 07:43:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: assigned_to Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg01872.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66483 Thomas Preud'homme changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|thopre01 at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Thinking about this, there cannot be a regression by removing an assert so having the bug not fully reproducible should not be an issue. I'll continue looking for the cause of such variance but the backport of r212178 can be made right now.