From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-493744-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 98539 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2015 12:08:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98224 invoked by uid 48); 30 Jul 2015 12:08:13 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/66521] xgcc: cc1plus segfaults when compiling libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/ostream-inst.cc
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 12:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66521-4-xvfdMWjv66@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66521-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg02634.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66521

--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #2)
> (CC-ing someone on a bug doesn't count as contacting them directly, right?
> Just making sure I'm not violating that line from MAINTAINERS...)

Right, you did the right thing, thanks.