From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-489380-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 123849 invoked by alias); 19 Jun 2015 09:06:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 123292 invoked by uid 48); 19 Jun 2015 09:06:54 -0000
From: "mikael at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/66578] [F2008] Invalid free on allocate(...,source=a(:)) in block
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 09:06:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66578-4-sNtiacsPED@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66578-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66578-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg01712.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66578

--- Comment #11 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
In gfc_conv_expr_descriptor, the bounds used to initialize the descriptor are
different from the ones passed to gfc_get_array_type_bounds.  That is the heart
of the problem, I think.
What I don't understand is how this could remain unnoticed for so long.