From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 61245 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2015 13:46:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 61200 invoked by uid 55); 22 Jun 2015 13:46:50 -0000 From: "joseph at codesourcery dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/66618] Failure to diagnose non-constant initializer for static object with -O1 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 13:46:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.4 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: joseph at codesourcery dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg01924.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66618 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Although diagnosing this probably makes sense, it's not required by the standard ("An implementation may accept other forms of constant expressions." - and this expression doesn't contain "assignment, increment, decrement, function-call, or comma operators", so isn't required by the Constraints for constant expressions not to be one).