public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/66633] [5/6 regression] ICE on valid "verify_gimple failed" with OpenMP
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 09:50:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-66633-4-264aeuBN0g@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-66633-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66633
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-06-24
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> The 4.9 branch accepts the code, at least at revision r222077,
> which makes this a regression.
This is only true for the reduced test in comment 1. This occurred between
revisions r211105 (2014-05-31, OK) and r211652 (2014-06-13, ICE).
The original test gives an ICE starting at 4.6.4 (it does not compile without
error with 4.5).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-24 9:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-23 1:23 [Bug fortran/66633] New: " abensonca at gmail dot com
2015-06-23 3:26 ` [Bug fortran/66633] " abensonca at gmail dot com
2015-06-23 9:44 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-24 9:30 ` [Bug fortran/66633] [5/6 regression] " mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-24 9:50 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr [this message]
2015-06-25 9:43 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-25 14:56 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 9:12 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 9:16 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 9:27 ` [Bug middle-end/66633] " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-01 8:22 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-01 8:26 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-01 19:20 ` abensonca at gmail dot com
2015-07-01 20:49 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-09 17:46 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-09 21:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-10 14:13 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-10 14:14 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-66633-4-264aeuBN0g@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).