From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 47724 invoked by alias); 27 Jun 2015 01:16:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 47695 invoked by uid 48); 27 Jun 2015 01:16:05 -0000 From: "guido.hatzsis at yandex dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug lto/66687] WPA link fau: internal compiler error: bytecode stream: found non-null terminated string Date: Sat, 27 Jun 2015 01:16:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: lto X-Bugzilla-Version: lto X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: guido.hatzsis at yandex dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-06/txt/msg03211.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66687 --- Comment #3 from Guido Haztsis --- Musl claims that they support LTO. Also all that I have changed was bumping gcc from the 5.1_release tag to the latest overnight commit. The res file doesn't even include libc.so (nor libc.a for a static build) which is strange and musl has long claimed to support lto without fat objects. (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > Are you sure that this is not a bug in musl?