public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/66697] Feature request: -mstackrealign and force_align_arg_pointer for x86_64 Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 06:51:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-66697-4-Y8K8tDRMVQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-66697-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66697 --- Comment #19 from Uroš Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Justas L from comment #18) > Out of curiosity, what could it be that makes -mincoming-stack-boundary=3 > successfully deal with rogue code while -mstackrealign fails at that? > Shouldn't -mstackrealign do the same job without being told what the outside > stack alignment is, or am I misunderstanding it? -mstackrealign conditionally generates realignment prologue, depending on presence of insns that require 128bit alignment. It looks that heuristics is not yet fully reliable on x86_64. Bugreports welcome! -mincoming-stack-boundary=3 and force_align_arg_pointer will always unconditionally generate realignment prologue >From gcc-bugs-return-498928-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Oct 07 07:29:11 2015 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-498928-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 129774 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2015 07:29:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 129717 invoked by uid 48); 7 Oct 2015 07:29:07 -0000 From: "chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/67880] New: [ARM] -fno-align-functions does not work for thumb Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2015 07:29:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: <bug-67880-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00483.txt.bz2 Content-length: 669 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idg880 Bug ID: 67880 Summary: [ARM] -fno-align-functions does not work for thumb Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- void foo() { } compiled with -O2 -mthumb -mno-align-functions .text .align 2 .global foo .syntax unified .code 16 .thumb_func is aligned on 4 bytes instead of default required 2 bytes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-07 6:51 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-06-29 20:03 [Bug target/66697] New: " bucaneer at gmail dot com 2015-09-29 4:26 ` [Bug target/66697] " austinenglish at gmail dot com 2015-10-04 15:29 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2015-10-04 21:23 ` bucaneer at gmail dot com 2015-10-05 9:08 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2015-10-05 17:40 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2015-10-05 19:55 ` bucaneer at gmail dot com 2015-10-06 6:40 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2015-10-06 9:21 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2015-10-06 12:33 ` bucaneer at gmail dot com 2015-10-06 13:45 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2015-10-06 16:38 ` bucaneer at gmail dot com 2015-10-06 16:42 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2015-10-06 16:53 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2015-10-06 23:09 ` bucaneer at gmail dot com 2015-10-07 6:51 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com [this message] 2015-10-07 10:49 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2015-10-07 12:13 ` bucaneer at gmail dot com 2015-10-07 12:17 ` hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2015-10-07 12:21 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com 2015-10-07 17:42 ` uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-10-12 16:30 ` uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-10-12 16:42 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-66697-4-Y8K8tDRMVQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).