public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/66728] [5/6 Regression] CONST_WIDE_INT causes corrupted DWARF debug info
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 17:22:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-66728-4-El3FrbdaoL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-66728-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2015-07-02
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org <rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Ulrich Weigand from comment #1)
> A bit of debugging shows that what's going on here is this:
>
> add_const_value_attribute is called with the following constant RTL:
> (const_wide_int 0x80000000000000000000000000000000)
>
> The routine then does:
> add_AT_wide (die, DW_AT_const_value,
> std::make_pair (rtl, GET_MODE (rtl)));
>
> Note that GET_MODE (rtl) is VOIDmode. This apparently causes creation of a
> wide_int value with precision 0:
> {<wide_int_storage> = {val = {0, -9223372036854775808, 2}, len = 2,
> precision = 0}
>
> This seems already wrong, but doesn't quite explain the inconsistent output.
Yeah, wide_ints shouldn't have precision 0. I think the later problems
do follow from that, although like you say there is probably a disconnect
between the way the DIEs are handled as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-02 17:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-01 17:39 [Bug debug/66728] New: " uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-01 17:48 ` [Bug debug/66728] " uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-01 17:50 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-02 7:50 ` [Bug debug/66728] [5/6 Regression] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-02 17:22 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-07-02 18:50 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-16 9:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-20 12:00 ` uweigand at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-20 20:57 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-03-22 7:53 ` [Bug debug/66728] [5 " cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-66728-4-El3FrbdaoL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).