From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-491307-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 12362 invoked by alias); 2 Jul 2015 20:47:46 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 12329 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jul 2015 20:47:43 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/66742] abort on sorting list with custom compiler that is not stateless
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2015 20:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-66742-4-L7QNaHLkrl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66742-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66742-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00197.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742

Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Indeed. Splicing lists has a precondition that l1.get_allocator() ==
l2.get_allocator(), and so we check:

  if (l1.get_allocator() != l2.get_allocator())
    abort();

and obviously that fails for your invalid allocator type.