* [Bug libstdc++/66792] Document sort template in bits/list.tcc
2015-07-07 17:43 [Bug libstdc++/66792] New: Document sort template in bits/list.tcc krichter at posteo dot de
@ 2015-07-08 9:05 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-08 9:23 ` krichter at posteo dot de
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-07-08 9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66792
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Would:
// The algorithm used here is unchanged from the SGI STL and is
// described in The C++ Standard Template Library by Plauger,
// Stepanov, Lee, Musser.
be good enough? ;-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/66792] Document sort template in bits/list.tcc
2015-07-07 17:43 [Bug libstdc++/66792] New: Document sort template in bits/list.tcc krichter at posteo dot de
2015-07-08 9:05 ` [Bug libstdc++/66792] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-07-08 9:23 ` krichter at posteo dot de
2021-07-01 17:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: krichter at posteo dot de @ 2015-07-08 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66792
--- Comment #2 from krichter at posteo dot de ---
I guess, _anything_ would be good enough :)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/66792] Document sort template in bits/list.tcc
2015-07-07 17:43 [Bug libstdc++/66792] New: Document sort template in bits/list.tcc krichter at posteo dot de
2015-07-08 9:05 ` [Bug libstdc++/66792] " redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-08 9:23 ` krichter at posteo dot de
@ 2021-07-01 17:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-01 19:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-07-01 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66792
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last reconfirmed| |2021-07-01
Depends on| |66742
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed in my patch for PR 66742
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742
[Bug 66742] abort on sorting list with custom allocator that is not stateless
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/66792] Document sort template in bits/list.tcc
2015-07-07 17:43 [Bug libstdc++/66792] New: Document sort template in bits/list.tcc krichter at posteo dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-07-01 17:53 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-10-01 19:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-10-01 19:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-10-01 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66792
Bug 66792 depends on bug 66742, which changed state.
Bug 66742 Summary: abort on sorting list with custom allocator that is not stateless
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/66792] Document sort template in bits/list.tcc
2015-07-07 17:43 [Bug libstdc++/66792] New: Document sort template in bits/list.tcc krichter at posteo dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-10-01 19:56 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-10-01 19:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-11-02 10:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-06 12:30 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-10-01 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66792
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed by r12-4082
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/66792] Document sort template in bits/list.tcc
2015-07-07 17:43 [Bug libstdc++/66792] New: Document sort template in bits/list.tcc krichter at posteo dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-10-01 19:57 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-11-02 10:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-06 12:30 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-11-02 10:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66792
Bug 66792 depends on bug 66742, which changed state.
Bug 66742 Summary: abort on sorting list with custom allocator that is not stateless
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |---
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* [Bug libstdc++/66792] Document sort template in bits/list.tcc
2015-07-07 17:43 [Bug libstdc++/66792] New: Document sort template in bits/list.tcc krichter at posteo dot de
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-11-02 10:16 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-06 12:30 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-06 12:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66792
Bug 66792 depends on bug 66742, which changed state.
Bug 66742 Summary: abort on sorting list with custom allocator that is not stateless
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66742
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread