From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-491950-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13661 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2015 09:16:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13613 invoked by uid 48); 10 Jul 2015 09:16:04 -0000
From: "ubizjak at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/66822] Turn -mtune=iamcu for size
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 09:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ubizjak at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66822-4-Q1sEyfXiz1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66822-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66822-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00840.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D66822

--- Comment #7 from Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak from comment #3)
> Please hold a bit with this change, I have a patch that improves generati=
on
> of zero_extend substantially.

Eh, it won't have such drastic effect on code size, so if size is priority,
X86_TUNE_ZERO_EXTEND_WITH_AND should be disabled.
>>From gcc-bugs-return-491951-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Jul 10 09:25:51 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-491951-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20282 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2015 09:25:50 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20062 invoked by uid 48); 10 Jul 2015 09:25:47 -0000
From: "paolo.carlini at oracle dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/65592] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when using non-existent enum class enumerator
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2015 09:25:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-65592-4-8IbvW4aggH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-65592-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-65592-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg00841.txt.bz2
Content-length: 204

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65592

--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> ---
This issue is already fixed in mainline. I'm adding a testcase and closing it.