* [Bug c++/66892] [DR355] Fix of core language defect 355 has status c++11 but is not implemented yet
[not found] <bug-66892-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2015-07-16 11:23 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-21 10:20 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-07-16 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66892
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |rejects-valid
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2015-07-16
Summary|Fix of core language defect |[DR355] Fix of core
|355 has status c++11 but is |language defect 355 has
|not implemented yet |status c++11 but is not
| |implemented yet
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The DR says GCC didn't warn back in 2002, but this has been rejected since at
least 4.3.6 so we must have changed it, in the wrong direction.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/66892] [DR355] Fix of core language defect 355 has status c++11 but is not implemented yet
[not found] <bug-66892-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-07-16 11:23 ` [Bug c++/66892] [DR355] Fix of core language defect 355 has status c++11 but is not implemented yet redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-10-21 10:20 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
2021-12-07 4:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: paolo.carlini at oracle dot com @ 2015-10-21 10:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66892
Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|enhancement |normal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/66892] [DR355] Fix of core language defect 355 has status c++11 but is not implemented yet
[not found] <bug-66892-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-07-16 11:23 ` [Bug c++/66892] [DR355] Fix of core language defect 355 has status c++11 but is not implemented yet redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-21 10:20 ` paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
@ 2021-12-07 4:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-07 4:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-07 4:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66892
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alias| |cwg355
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
testcase:
struct A;
struct ::A { };
namespace B {
struct A;
}
struct ::B::A { };
Looks the error message was added with the new parser in GCC 3.4.0.
The fix might be easy but I have not tested it to see if there is any
regressions.
That is remove the following code from parser.c:
/* Issue the error about the overly-qualified name now. */
if (qualified_p)
{
cp_parser_error (parser,
"global qualification of class name is invalid");
type = error_mark_node;
goto out;
}
else
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/66892] [DR355] Fix of core language defect 355 has status c++11 but is not implemented yet
[not found] <bug-66892-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-12-07 4:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-07 4:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-12-07 5:01 ` [Bug c++/66892] [9/10/11/12 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-07 4:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66892
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |haoxintu at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 95610 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/66892] [9/10/11/12 Regression] [DR355] Fix of core language defect 355 has status c++11 but is not implemented yet
[not found] <bug-66892-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-12-07 4:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-12-07 5:01 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-17 15:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-12-07 5:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66892
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Summary|[DR355] Fix of core |[9/10/11/12 Regression]
|language defect 355 has |[DR355] Fix of core
|status c++11 but is not |language defect 355 has
|implemented yet |status c++11 but is not
| |implemented yet
Known to fail| |3.4.0
Known to work| |3.3.3
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Since the defect report says it work in GCC at the time I am going to assume
this actually did and it was introduced by the new parser so this is a
regression.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/66892] [9/10/11/12 Regression] [DR355] Fix of core language defect 355 has status c++11 but is not implemented yet
[not found] <bug-66892-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-12-07 5:01 ` [Bug c++/66892] [9/10/11/12 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-01-17 15:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:35 ` [Bug c++/66892] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-01-17 15:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66892
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version|unknown |11.1.0
Priority|P3 |P2
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/66892] [10/11/12/13 Regression] [DR355] Fix of core language defect 355 has status c++11 but is not implemented yet
[not found] <bug-66892-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-01-17 15:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:35 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:30 ` [Bug c++/66892] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66892
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/66892] [10/11/12/13 Regression] [DR355] Fix of core language defect 355 has status c++11 but is not implemented yet
[not found] <bug-66892-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:35 ` [Bug c++/66892] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:30 ` [Bug c++/66892] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66892
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/66892] [11/12/13/14 Regression] [DR355] Fix of core language defect 355 has status c++11 but is not implemented yet
[not found] <bug-66892-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:30 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66892
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread