[Bug fortran/66927] [6.0 regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

["juergen.reuter at desy dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927

--- Comment #4 from Jürgen Reuter <juergen.reuter at desy dot de> ---
Actually, we are using now

allocate (obj(1:size (func ()))
obj = func ()

as you are saying 
allocate (obj, source = func ())
had problems in gfortran 4.7.X. 
So the issue is not a problem for our code(s). 

But you are saying that the code triggering the ICE violates the Fortran
standard?
>From gcc-bugs-return-492731-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Jul 18 10:15:32 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-492731-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 72443 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2015 10:15:32 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 72397 invoked by uid 48); 18 Jul 2015 10:15:28 -0000
From: "vehre at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/66927] [6.0 regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 10:15:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vehre at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-66927-4-u4plBNf9U4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66927-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66927-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg01621.txt.bz2
Content-length: 795

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idf927

vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vehre at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am not that bold anymore to interpret the nasty standard. I wanted to
express, that the allocate(obj, source=func()) is now sufficient.

I made some bad experience trying to interpret the standard and was told off
not to do so. Therefore, I will not say "yes, it violates the standard" nor
"no, it doesn't".

Given there are many programs, that use the work-around you've shown, I am
unsure what to do here. But you are right, ICE'ing is a no go.