public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/66930] [5 Regression]: gengtype.c is miscompiled during stage2
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:47:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-66930-4-YJf22wI5Em@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-66930-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66930

--- Comment #13 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #12)
> 
> --- a/config/sh/sh-protos.h
> +++ b/config/sh/sh-protos.h
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ sh_find_set_of_reg (rtx reg, rtx_insn* insn, F stepfunc,
>      {
>        if (BARRIER_P (result.insn))
>  	break;
> -      if (!NONJUMP_INSN_P (result.insn))
> +      if (!NONJUMP_INSN_P (result.insn) && !CALL_P (result.insn))
>  	continue;
>        if (reg_set_p (reg, result.insn))
>  	{
> 
> and it works like as my expectation, though I'm not sure whether it's
> a "right thing" or not.

This would be OK for hardregs (which are clobbered by calls).  When working on
pseudos, it's actually OK to ignore calls.  Maybe it'd be a good idea to extend
sh_find_set_of_reg to check for call clobbered hardregs only.  This will make
the function easier to use.
>From gcc-bugs-return-493160-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Jul 24 04:48:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-493160-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105747 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2015 04:48:30 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 105705 invoked by uid 55); 24 Jul 2015 04:48:21 -0000
From: "naveenh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/25529] (unsigned * 2)/2 is not changed into unsigned &0x7FFFFFFF
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 04:48:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.2.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, TREE
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: naveenh at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-25529-4-ulTm1TLafl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-25529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-25529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg02050.txt.bz2
Content-length: 624

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id%529

--- Comment #2 from naveenh at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: naveenh
Date: Fri Jul 24 04:47:48 2015
New Revision: 226136

URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev"6136&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/25529
2015-07-24  Naveen H.S  <Naveen.Hurugalawadi@caviumnetworks.com>

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
        * gcc.dg/pr25529.c: New test.

gcc/ChangeLog:
        * match.pd (trunc_div (mult @0 integer_pow2p@1) @1) : New simplifier.


Added:
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr25529.c
Modified:
    trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
    trunk/gcc/match.pd
    trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-24  3:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-66930-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-07-19  2:32 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-20  9:21 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-07-20 13:25 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-07-20 13:46 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-07-21 16:46 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-07-23  5:21 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-23  8:03 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-07-23  8:59 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-23  9:08 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de
2015-07-23 13:48 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-24  0:08 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-24  3:47 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-07-24 13:40 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-24 13:41 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-25 11:04 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-07-25 14:14 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-66930-4-YJf22wI5Em@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).