public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/66930] [5 Regression]: gengtype.c is miscompiled during stage2 Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:47:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-66930-4-YJf22wI5Em@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-66930-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66930 --- Comment #13 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #12) > > --- a/config/sh/sh-protos.h > +++ b/config/sh/sh-protos.h > @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ sh_find_set_of_reg (rtx reg, rtx_insn* insn, F stepfunc, > { > if (BARRIER_P (result.insn)) > break; > - if (!NONJUMP_INSN_P (result.insn)) > + if (!NONJUMP_INSN_P (result.insn) && !CALL_P (result.insn)) > continue; > if (reg_set_p (reg, result.insn)) > { > > and it works like as my expectation, though I'm not sure whether it's > a "right thing" or not. This would be OK for hardregs (which are clobbered by calls). When working on pseudos, it's actually OK to ignore calls. Maybe it'd be a good idea to extend sh_find_set_of_reg to check for call clobbered hardregs only. This will make the function easier to use. >From gcc-bugs-return-493160-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Jul 24 04:48:30 2015 Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-493160-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org> Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105747 invoked by alias); 24 Jul 2015 04:48:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org> List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/> List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org> List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org> Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 105705 invoked by uid 55); 24 Jul 2015 04:48:21 -0000 From: "naveenh at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/25529] (unsigned * 2)/2 is not changed into unsigned &0x7FFFFFFF Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 04:48:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.2.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization, TREE X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: naveenh at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: <bug-25529-4-ulTm1TLafl@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-25529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-25529-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg02050.txt.bz2 Content-length: 624 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id%529 --- Comment #2 from naveenh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: naveenh Date: Fri Jul 24 04:47:48 2015 New Revision: 226136 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev"6136&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/25529 2015-07-24 Naveen H.S <Naveen.Hurugalawadi@caviumnetworks.com> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/pr25529.c: New test. gcc/ChangeLog: * match.pd (trunc_div (mult @0 integer_pow2p@1) @1) : New simplifier. Added: trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr25529.c Modified: trunk/gcc/ChangeLog trunk/gcc/match.pd trunk/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-24 3:47 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top [not found] <bug-66930-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> 2015-07-19 2:32 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-07-20 9:21 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de 2015-07-20 13:25 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de 2015-07-20 13:46 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de 2015-07-21 16:46 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de 2015-07-23 5:21 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-07-23 8:03 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de 2015-07-23 8:59 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-07-23 9:08 ` glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de 2015-07-23 13:48 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-07-24 0:08 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-07-24 3:47 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2015-07-24 13:40 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-07-24 13:41 ` kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-07-25 11:04 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-07-25 14:14 ` olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-66930-4-YJf22wI5Em@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).