From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-492919-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 40888 invoked by alias); 21 Jul 2015 13:28:54 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 40553 invoked by uid 48); 21 Jul 2015 13:28:49 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/66946] Spurious uninitialized warning
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:28:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-66946-4-oHDju7OiXk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-66946-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-66946-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg01809.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66946

--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Comment on attachment 36021
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36021
minimal example

written == ((wchar_t) 0xfffd)

Will ever be true or is there some sign extending going on which causes this to
be false for the default case?