From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3616 invoked by alias); 25 Jul 2015 22:10:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3588 invoked by uid 48); 25 Jul 2015 22:10:33 -0000 From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/66968] Incorrect template argument shown in diagnostic Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 22:10:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg02235.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66968 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes maybe a dup of PR99 but it looks like all the examples in that bug involve an overload and using the parameter names from the wrong overload. Here it uses the parameter from a function that never participates in overload resolution.