From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 73520388B823; Wed, 18 Aug 2021 12:40:28 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 73520388B823 From: "marxin at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ipa/67014] builtin_tolower is inefficient. Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 12:40:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: ipa X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 12:40:28 -0000 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D67014 Martin Li=C5=A1ka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW --- Comment #3 from Martin Li=C5=A1ka --- So the macro definition comes from glibc: ctype/ctype.h # if __GNUC__ >=3D 2 && defined __OPTIMIZE__ && !defined __cplusplus # define tolower(c) __tobody (c, tolower, *__ctype_tolower_loc (), (c)) # define toupper(c) __tobody (c, toupper, *__ctype_toupper_loc (), (c)) # endif /* Optimizing gcc */ That's why the GCC compiler can't map it to a builtin. On the other hand, I don't see why would it be beneficial in this case?=