public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/67039] New: Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect
@ 2015-07-28  3:27 spam.brian.taylor at gmail dot com
  2015-07-28  6:17 ` [Bug fortran/67039] " kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (4 more replies)
  0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: spam.brian.taylor at gmail dot com @ 2015-07-28  3:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039

            Bug ID: 67039
           Summary: Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is
                    incorrect
           Product: gcc
           Version: 5.2.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: trivial
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: spam.brian.taylor at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

The gfortran documentation for the RANDOM_NUMBER and RANDOM_SEED subroutines
indicates that they are part of Fortran 95 and later.  In fact, they were
included in the Fortran 90 standard.

The gfortran documentation for the SRAND subroutine, a GNU extension, includes
in the "Notes" section the following: "The Fortran 2003 standard specifies the
intrinsic RANDOM_SEED to initialize the pseudo-random numbers generator and
RANDOM_NUMBER to generate pseudo-random numbers."  The reference here should be
to the Fortran 90 standard, not 2003.

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-5.2.0/gfortran/RANDOM_005fNUMBER.html#RANDOM_005fNUMBER

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-5.2.0/gfortran/RANDOM_005fSEED.html#RANDOM_005fSEED

https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-5.2.0/gfortran/SRAND.html#SRAND


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/67039] Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect
  2015-07-28  3:27 [Bug fortran/67039] New: Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect spam.brian.taylor at gmail dot com
@ 2015-07-28  6:17 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-08-29 15:21 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-07-28  6:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039

kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Brian Taylor from comment #0)
> The gfortran documentation for the RANDOM_NUMBER and RANDOM_SEED subroutines
> indicates that they are part of Fortran 95 and later.

Well, they are part of Fortran 95 and later standards.

> In fact, they were included in the Fortran 90 standard.

Which is irrelevant as gfortran started life with the ambitions
to be a Fortran 95 compiler.  You'll note that there isn't a
-std=f90 nor -std=f77 mode.  In fact, you'll find all intrinsic
procedures in the documentation that are listed in the Fortran
95 and that also appear Fortran 90 are listed as "Fortran 95 
and later".

> The gfortran documentation for the SRAND subroutine, a GNU extension,
> includes in the "Notes" section the following: "The Fortran 2003 standard
> specifies the intrinsic RANDOM_SEED to initialize the pseudo-random numbers
> generator and RANDOM_NUMBER to generate pseudo-random numbers."  The
> reference here should be to the Fortran 90 standard, not 2003.

Yeah, this could use some word smithing. It appears
to be an attempt to discourage use of srand and rand
in favor of the standard intrinsic subprograms.  You
also left out the most incorrect part of the documentation.
gfortran uses 4 independent KISS generators, but
implementation details should probably be removed
here.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/67039] Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect
  2015-07-28  3:27 [Bug fortran/67039] New: Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect spam.brian.taylor at gmail dot com
  2015-07-28  6:17 ` [Bug fortran/67039] " kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-08-29 15:21 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2015-08-29 15:48 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2015-08-29 15:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039

Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2015-08-29
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
Resolved as WONTFIX?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/67039] Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect
  2015-07-28  3:27 [Bug fortran/67039] New: Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect spam.brian.taylor at gmail dot com
  2015-07-28  6:17 ` [Bug fortran/67039] " kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-08-29 15:21 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2015-08-29 15:48 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
  2015-08-30 10:34 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2015-09-30 22:20 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-08-29 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039

--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> Resolved as WONTFIX?

Probably not.  See the last 2 paragraphs in comment #1.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/67039] Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect
  2015-07-28  3:27 [Bug fortran/67039] New: Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect spam.brian.taylor at gmail dot com
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-08-29 15:48 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-08-30 10:34 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
  2015-09-30 22:20 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2015-08-30 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039

--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
> > Resolved as WONTFIX?
>
> Probably not.  See the last 2 paragraphs in comment #1.

Sorry, but my question was motivated by the reading of these two paragraphs!-(
Thus two more explicit questions:

(1) Shall I submit a patch to replace in the manual all the "Fortran 95 and
later" with "Fortran 90 and later" where appropriate?

(2) Shall I submit a patch to replace 

The Fortran 2003 standard specifies the intrinsic RANDOM_SEED to initialize 
the pseudo-random numbers generator and RANDOM_NUMBER to generate 
pseudo-random numbers.

with

The Fortran 9? standard specifies the intrinsic RANDOM_SEED to initialize 
the pseudo-random numbers generator and RANDOM_NUMBER to generate 
pseudo-random numbers. These intrinsics should be used in new codes.

?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* [Bug fortran/67039] Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect
  2015-07-28  3:27 [Bug fortran/67039] New: Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect spam.brian.taylor at gmail dot com
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2015-08-30 10:34 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2015-09-30 22:20 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
  4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-09-30 22:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039

--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #4)
> > > Resolved as WONTFIX?
> >
> > Probably not.  See the last 2 paragraphs in comment #1.
> 
> Sorry, but my question was motivated by the reading of these two
> paragraphs!-(
> Thus two more explicit questions:
> 
> (1) Shall I submit a patch to replace in the manual all the "Fortran 95 and
> later" with "Fortran 90 and later" where appropriate?

No.  gfortran never tried to address the Fortran 90 standard.
Whatever is stated in F90 is irrelevant to the extent that 
gfortran is a Fortran 95 compiler and F90 beget F95.

> 
> (2) Shall I submit a patch to replace 
> 
> The Fortran 2003 standard specifies the intrinsic RANDOM_SEED to initialize 
> the pseudo-random numbers generator and RANDOM_NUMBER to generate 
> pseudo-random numbers.
> 
> with
> 
> The Fortran 9? standard specifies the intrinsic RANDOM_SEED to initialize
> the pseudo-random numbers generator and RANDOM_NUMBER to generate 
> pseudo-random numbers. These intrinsics should be used in new codes.
> 

I would not not call out a particular standard version.  Probably
something like 

 The Fortran standard specifies the intrinsic subroutine RANDOM_SEED
 to initialize the pseudo-random numbers generator and the intrinsic
 subroutine RANDOM_NUMBER to generate pseudo-random numbers.  These
 subroutines should be used in new codes.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-30 22:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-07-28  3:27 [Bug fortran/67039] New: Documentation of pseudorandom number intrinsics is incorrect spam.brian.taylor at gmail dot com
2015-07-28  6:17 ` [Bug fortran/67039] " kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-29 15:21 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-08-29 15:48 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-30 10:34 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-09-30 22:20 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).