From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
 id DEFCE3853801; Wed,  4 Aug 2021 22:07:03 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org DEFCE3853801
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67048] [9/10/11/12 Regression] GCC rejects well-formed
 program using empty anonymous enum specifier in a variable declaration
Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 22:07:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, rejects-valid
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 9.5
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_known_to_work target_milestone cf_known_to_fail
 short_desc
Message-ID: <bug-67048-4-J3q2XZ1J0J@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67048-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67048-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Gcc-bugs mailing list <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/options/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://gcc.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcc-bugs>,
 <mailto:gcc-bugs-request@gcc.gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2021 22:07:04 -0000

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D67048

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Known to work|                            |4.8.5
   Target Milestone|---                         |9.5
      Known to fail|                            |10.1.0, 11.1.0, 4.9.0,
                   |                            |9.4.0
            Summary|GCC rejects well-formed     |[9/10/11/12 Regression] GCC
                   |program using empty         |rejects well-formed program
                   |anonymous enum specifier in |using empty anonymous enum
                   |a variable declaration      |specifier in a variable
                   |                            |declaration

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
This was almost definitely caused by PR 54216 .=