From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-493757-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 52004 invoked by alias); 30 Jul 2015 15:23:42 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 51968 invoked by uid 48); 30 Jul 2015 15:23:38 -0000
From: "daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67064] Register asm variable broken
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 15:23:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-67064-4-6SqGgYD3mK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67064-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67064-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-07/txt/msg02647.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67064

Daniel Gutson <daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |daniel.gutson@tallertechnol
                   |                            |ogies.com

--- Comment #5 from Daniel Gutson <daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com> ---
FWIW, g++ 4.8.4 and clang 3.5 do not complain in the following code:

struct s {
  int i;
};

//register struct s *reg __asm__( "1" );
s* reg;

int f(void)
{
  int i;

  i = reg->i;
  i = (reg)->i;

  return i;
}

As from the same paragraphs of the standard, I don't think that a adding
parenthesis should alter the "valueness type" outside a decltype, meaning that
this could be an error lately introduced. I'll ask for a Committee member help
here.