From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 57979 invoked by alias); 3 Aug 2015 18:53:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 57702 invoked by uid 48); 3 Aug 2015 18:53:54 -0000 From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/67064] Register asm variable broken Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 18:53:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00132.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D67064 Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #19 from Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez --- (In reply to Daniel Gutson from comment #18) > Please assign this to me. Thanks. You need to login with your @gcc.gnu.org account to be able to assign bugs = (and do other Bugzilla operations). >>From gcc-bugs-return-493991-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Aug 03 19:03:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 92038 invoked by alias); 3 Aug 2015 19:03:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 91834 invoked by uid 48); 3 Aug 2015 19:03:43 -0000 From: "daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/67064] Register asm variable broken Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 19:03:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: rejects-valid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00133.txt.bz2 Content-length: 686 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D67064 --- Comment #20 from Daniel Gutson --- (In reply to Manuel L=C3=B3pez-Ib=C3=A1=C3=B1ez from comment #19) > (In reply to Daniel Gutson from comment #18) > > Please assign this to me. Thanks. >=20 > You need to login with your @gcc.gnu.org account to be able to assign bugs > (and do other Bugzilla operations). I don't have a @gcc.gnu.org account. Should I simply send the attachment? Otherwise please assign this to me for me if it is still possible. FWIW, I'= ve been listed in the MAINTAINER list in the past while working for CodeSource= ry but my name no longer is in that list. >>From gcc-bugs-return-493992-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Aug 03 19:08:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 99668 invoked by alias); 3 Aug 2015 19:08:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 99212 invoked by uid 48); 3 Aug 2015 19:08:25 -0000 From: "kargl at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/66079] [6 Regression] memory leak with source allocation in internal subprogram Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 19:08:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: kargl at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pault at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00134.txt.bz2 Content-length: 936 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66079 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #8) > Created attachment 36113 [details] > Patch for th 5 branch > > Before closing this PR, I checked and found that the 5 branch now leaks > memory. > > The attached fixes the memory leak but does not fix the ICEs for which the > tests have been commented out. There is already too much divergence in > trans_allocate between 5 and 6 to do any more. > > What do you think about applying this patch, which bootstraps and regtests? > I think that it would be fine to apply the patch (as you already have done the backport of a patch and tested it).