public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/67133] [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2274
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 18:28:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-67133-4-vKJLYj6HfX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-67133-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133

Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |law at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Zhendong Su from comment #0)
> The following code causes an ICE when compiled with the current gcc trunk at
> -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes.
> 
> It is a regression from 5.1.x. 

This was already latent in r226635, just compile with options:

-Os -fisolate-erroneous-paths-dereference -fisolate-erroneous-paths-attribute

The problem is that infer_nonnull_range gets:

(gdb) p debug_gimple_stmt(stmt)
__builtin_unreachable ();

which is decorated with attributes:

(gdb) p debug_tree(attrs)
 <tree_list 0x7ffff64b3bb8
    purpose <identifier_node 0x7ffff644b3c0 nonnull>
    value <tree_list 0x7ffff645edc0
        value <integer_cst 0x7ffff6444060 constant 1>>
    chain <tree_list 0x7ffff64b3b90
        purpose <identifier_node 0x7ffff644b2d0 format>
        value <tree_list 0x7ffff6460730
            value <identifier_node 0x7ffff644b550 printf>
            chain <tree_list 0x7ffff645ef00 value <integer_cst 0x7ffff6444060
1>
                chain <tree_list 0x7ffff645ede8
                    value <integer_cst 0x7ffff6444318 constant 2>>>>>>

That is, this __builtin_unreachable has __attribute__((nonnull(1))), which
doesn't make any sense and breaks infer_nonnull_range when it tries to access
its first argument.

I have no idea whatsoever how __builtin_unreachable gets to have attribute
nonnull, but that is a pre-existing bug. Surprising it doesn't break more
stuff.
>From gcc-bugs-return-494314-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Aug 06 18:36:06 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-494314-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 20014 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2015 18:36:06 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 18169 invoked by uid 48); 6 Aug 2015 18:36:01 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/67133] [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2274
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 18:36:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67133-4-TA55TiHlcV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67133-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67133-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00456.txt.bz2
Content-length: 248

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133

--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Or even with options: -O2 -fisolate-erroneous-paths-attribute

(why is the latter not enabled by default?)
>From gcc-bugs-return-494315-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Aug 06 18:41:43 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-494315-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 42620 invoked by alias); 6 Aug 2015 18:41:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 42561 invoked by uid 48); 6 Aug 2015 18:41:39 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67139] [concepts] ICE on checking concepts with void
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 18:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: c++-concepts
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cf_reconfirmed_on cc everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-67139-4-pIulJJAaDi@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67139-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67139-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg00457.txt.bz2
Content-length: 2983

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idg139

Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2015-08-06
                 CC|                            |trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
markus@x4 tmp % cat o.ii
template <typename T> typename T::typevalue_type _v;
template <class T> concept bool Constructible() { return _v<T>; }

template <class T> concept bool MoveConstructible() {
  return Constructible<T &&>();
}

template <class> constexpr bool move_constructible() { return false; }
MoveConstructible { T }
constexpr bool move_constructible() { return true; }

static_assert((!move_constructible<void>()), "");


markus@x4 tmp % g++ -std=gnu++1z -c o.ii
o.ii:12:42: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
 static_assert((!move_constructible<void>()), "");
                                          ^
0xc7f85f crash_signal
        ../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:352
0x7fab31e0770f ???
        /var/tmp/glibc/signal/../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/sigaction.c:0
0xef7bd0 strip_array_types(tree_node*)
        ../../gcc/gcc/tree.c:8194
0x71a2e8 cp_type_quals(tree_node const*)
        ../../gcc/gcc/cp/typeck.c:9006
0x790024 cv_unqualified(tree_node*)
        ../../gcc/gcc/cp/tree.c:1161
0x7fc8c4 satisfy_predicate_constraint
        ../../gcc/gcc/cp/constraint.cc:1705
0x7fc8c4 satisfy_constraint_1
        ../../gcc/gcc/cp/constraint.cc:1901
0x7fd5f6 satisfy_constraint
        ../../gcc/gcc/cp/constraint.cc:1952
0x7fd74c constraints_satisfied_p(tree_node*)
        ../../gcc/gcc/cp/constraint.cc:2059
0x5d832c add_function_candidate
        ../../gcc/gcc/cp/call.c:1986
0x5d8e88 add_template_candidate_real
        ../../gcc/gcc/cp/call.c:3109
0x5d957c add_template_candidate
        ../../gcc/gcc/cp/call.c:3151
0x5d957c add_candidates
        ../../gcc/gcc/cp/call.c:5307
0x5dbc03 perform_overload_resolution
        ../../gcc/gcc/cp/call.c:4003
0x5de10e build_new_function_call(tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc,
vl_embed>**, bool, int)
        ../../gcc/gcc/cp/call.c:4080
0x76b998 finish_call_expr(tree_node*, vec<tree_node*, va_gc, vl_embed>**, bool,
bool, int)
        ../../gcc/gcc/cp/semantics.c:2391
0x6e9737 cp_parser_postfix_expression
        ../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:6421
0x6ee229 cp_parser_unary_expression
        ../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:7485
0x6ee188 cp_parser_unary_expression
        ../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:7438
0x6eee57 cp_parser_binary_expression
        ../../gcc/gcc/cp/parser.c:8222
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-08-06 18:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <bug-67133-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2015-08-06  8:58 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-06  9:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-06  9:00 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-06  9:00 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-06  9:03 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-06 18:28 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2015-08-06 18:48 ` trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-06 19:21 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-13 15:29 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-13 15:56 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-13 16:03 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-13 16:13 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-14  8:34 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-14  9:02 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-14 10:04 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-14 12:36 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-14 12:43 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-14 13:11 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-17 11:34 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-17 14:09 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-17 14:46 ` jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-18  7:37 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-19 14:23 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-19 14:23 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-24 16:07 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-67133-4-vKJLYj6HfX@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).