public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug fortran/67174] New: [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs
@ 2015-08-10 13:48 ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-10 13:49 ` [Bug fortran/67174] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-08-10 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67174
Bug ID: 67174
Summary: [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: *-*-solaris2.11
Target: *-*-solaris2.11
Build: *-*-solaris2.11
Since about 20150529 (r223861), there's a testsuite regression on Solaris 11
(both sparc and x86, both 32 and 64-bit):
FAIL: gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 -O changing do-iterator 3 (test for
errors, line 10)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 -O changing do-iterator 3 (test for
errors, line 9)
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/67174] [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs
2015-08-10 13:48 [Bug fortran/67174] New: [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-08-10 13:49 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-29 16:16 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-08-10 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67174
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/67174] [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs
2015-08-10 13:48 [Bug fortran/67174] New: [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-10 13:49 ` [Bug fortran/67174] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-08-29 16:16 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-30 13:30 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-08-31 11:36 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-08-29 16:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67174
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
> Since about 20150529 (r223861), there's a testsuite regression on Solaris 11
> (both sparc and x86, both 32 and 64-bit):
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 -O changing do-iterator 3 (test for
> errors, line 10)
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 -O changing do-iterator 3 (test for
> errors, line 9)
>
> Rainer
Hi Rainer,
If you run the testcase outside of the testsuite does the error appear but
without the offending line? I have been plagued by such a problem with an F2008
patch that I have prepared.
Cheers
Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/67174] [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs
2015-08-10 13:48 [Bug fortran/67174] New: [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-10 13:49 ` [Bug fortran/67174] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-29 16:16 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-08-30 13:30 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-08-31 11:36 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: dominiq at lps dot ens.fr @ 2015-08-30 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67174
Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed| |2015-08-30
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
WORKSFORME on x86_64-apple-darwin14.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug fortran/67174] [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs
2015-08-10 13:48 [Bug fortran/67174] New: [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2015-08-30 13:30 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
@ 2015-08-31 11:36 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: ro at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-08-31 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67174
Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #1)
> If you run the testcase outside of the testsuite does the error appear but
> without the offending line? I have been plagued by such a problem with an
> F2008 patch that I have prepared.
It does indeed. It occured to me that this might be the same problem which
causes
FAIL: gcc.dg/unroll-2.c (test for warnings, line 24)
on Solaris 11 only (S10 and S12 are both fine). This seems to be a kernel bug
causing truncation of pty output.
I might xfail both testcases to avoid the noise if this can be confirmed.
Rainer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-08-31 11:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-08-10 13:48 [Bug fortran/67174] New: [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-10 13:49 ` [Bug fortran/67174] " ro at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-29 16:16 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-08-30 13:30 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-08-31 11:36 ` ro at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).