[Bug fortran/67174] New: [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs

[Bug fortran/67174] New: [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs

[ro at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67174

            Bug ID: 67174
           Summary: [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs
           Product: gcc
           Version: 6.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: fortran
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---
              Host: *-*-solaris2.11
            Target: *-*-solaris2.11
             Build: *-*-solaris2.11

Since about 20150529 (r223861), there's a testsuite regression on Solaris 11
(both sparc and x86, both 32 and 64-bit):

FAIL: gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90   -O  changing do-iterator 3 (test for
errors, line 10)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90   -O  changing do-iterator 3 (test for
errors, line 9)

  Rainer

[Bug fortran/67174] [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs

[ro at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67174

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Target Milestone|---                         |6.0

[Bug fortran/67174] [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs

[pault at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67174

Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
> Since about 20150529 (r223861), there's a testsuite regression on Solaris 11
> (both sparc and x86, both 32 and 64-bit):
> 
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90   -O  changing do-iterator 3 (test for
> errors, line 10)
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90   -O  changing do-iterator 3 (test for
> errors, line 9)
> 
>   Rainer

Hi Rainer,

If you run the testcase outside of the testsuite does the error appear but
without the offending line? I have been plagued by such a problem with an F2008
patch that I have prepared.

Cheers

Paul

[Bug fortran/67174] [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs

[dominiq at lps dot ens.fr]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67174

Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |WAITING
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2015-08-30
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres <dominiq at lps dot ens.fr> ---
WORKSFORME on x86_64-apple-darwin14.

[Bug fortran/67174] [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs

[ro at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67174

Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID

--- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth <ro at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #1)

> If you run the testcase outside of the testsuite does the error appear but
> without the offending line? I have been plagued by such a problem with an
> F2008 patch that I have prepared.

It does indeed.  It occured to me that this might be the same problem which
causes

FAIL: gcc.dg/unroll-2.c  (test for warnings, line 24)

on Solaris 11 only (S10 and S12 are both fine).  This seems to be a kernel bug
causing truncation of pty output.

I might xfail both testcases to avoid the noise if this can be confirmed.

  Rainer