From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-495865-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 62707 invoked by alias); 29 Aug 2015 16:16:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 62663 invoked by uid 48); 29 Aug 2015 16:16:19 -0000
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/67174] [6 regression] gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90 FAILs
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2015 16:16:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-67174-4-rbJtacB0Sg@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67174-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67174-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg02007.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67174

Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |pault at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #1 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
> Since about 20150529 (r223861), there's a testsuite regression on Solaris 11
> (both sparc and x86, both 32 and 64-bit):
> 
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90   -O  changing do-iterator 3 (test for
> errors, line 10)
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/do_iterator.f90   -O  changing do-iterator 3 (test for
> errors, line 9)
> 
>   Rainer

Hi Rainer,

If you run the testcase outside of the testsuite does the error appear but
without the offending line? I have been plagued by such a problem with an F2008
patch that I have prepared.

Cheers

Paul