public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67396] [4.9/5/6 regression] Performance regression compiling variadic function with many arguments in RTL DSE Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:10:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-67396-4-tvqXi3JdGt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-67396-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67396 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target| |x86_64-*-* Component|target |rtl-optimization Version|unknown |5.2.0 Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4 Summary|[4.9/5.0 regression] |[4.9/5/6 regression] |Performance regression |Performance regression |compiling variadic function |compiling variadic function |with many arguments |with many arguments in RTL | |DSE --- Comment #6 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I suppose this is a quite old quadraticness in RTL DSE (or rather find_base_term).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-31 8:10 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2015-08-29 22:09 [Bug c/67396] New: [4.9/5.0 regression] Performance regression compiling variadic function with many arguments ppluzhnikov at google dot com 2015-08-30 16:36 ` [Bug c/67396] " ppluzhnikov at google dot com 2015-08-30 16:53 ` [Bug target/67396] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-08-30 17:14 ` ppluzhnikov at google dot com 2015-08-30 17:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-08-30 18:03 ` ppluzhnikov at google dot com 2015-08-31 8:10 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2015-08-31 9:20 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/67396] " miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org 2015-08-31 9:26 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/67396] [4.9/5/6 regression] Performance regression compiling variadic function with many arguments in RTL DSE miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-67396-4-tvqXi3JdGt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).