From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 112195 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2015 22:56:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 112172 invoked by uid 48); 31 Aug 2015 22:56:48 -0000 From: "Bernhard.Rosenkranzer at linaro dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug regression/67415] [5.1/5.2 Regression] -mcpu= breaks -print-file-name for ARM crosscompilers Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 22:56:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: regression X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.2.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: Bernhard.Rosenkranzer at linaro dot org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-08/txt/msg02163.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D67415 --- Comment #1 from Bernhard Rosenkr=C3=A4nzer --- Workaround: add -march=3Darmv7-a to the command line as well >>From gcc-bugs-return-496022-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Tue Sep 01 02:11:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 34163 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2015 02:11:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 32336 invoked by uid 48); 1 Sep 2015 02:11:08 -0000 From: "msebor at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/67386] missing diagnostic on a use of an undeclared function Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2015 02:11:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2 Content-length: 715 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67386 Martin Sebor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- As noted in the discussion, the GCC behavior in the Description of this bug matches the intent (if not the words) of the C90 standard. Any change here would only serve to break existing programs that rely on it. Closing as invalid. (Adding a test to exercise this behavior might be worthwhile.)