public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/67429] [5/6 Regression] Missing part of error messages.
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:38:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-67429-4-AY6gZ1QgfI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-67429-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Sep 4 18:37:50 2015
New Revision: 227500
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227500&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-09-04 Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/67429
* error.c (gfc_clear_pp_buffer): Reset last_location, otherwise
caret lines might be skipped when actually giving a diagnostic.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/fortran/error.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-496397-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Sep 04 18:38:07 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-496397-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41824 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2015 18:38:07 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 41768 invoked by uid 48); 4 Sep 2015 18:38:04 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/60725] [-Wreturn-type] false positive in trivial switch
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:38:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-60725-4-TXZf8b4moC@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-60725-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-60725-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00375.txt.bz2
Content-length: 828
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60725
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5)
> Not to complicate things too much, but reaching the closing } of a non-void
> function is valid in C. What is not valid (i.e., has undefined behavior) is
> calling such a function and using its return value when none was provided
> (as in the program in comment #3). The program in the Description, however,
> has well-defined behavior because f1's return value isn't used.
Good point. I don't know whether it is possible for the sanitizers to
distinguish between the two cases.
Pretty sure it is not possible for the warning code, since at the time of
warning we know nothing of the callers (not even if there are any callers).
>From gcc-bugs-return-496399-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Sep 04 18:41:44 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-496399-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50754 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2015 18:41:43 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 50705 invoked by uid 55); 4 Sep 2015 18:41:40 -0000
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/67429] [5/6 Regression] Missing part of error messages.
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:41:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67429-4-ArXZP8nGLk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67429-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67429-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00377.txt.bz2
Content-length: 600
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67429
--- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Sep 4 18:41:08 2015
New Revision: 227501
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227501&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-09-04 Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/67429
* error.c (gfc_clear_pp_buffer): Reset last_location, otherwise
caret lines might be skipped when actually giving a diagnostic.
Modified:
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
branches/gcc-5-branch/gcc/fortran/error.c
>From gcc-bugs-return-496400-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Sep 04 18:43:59 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-496400-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 65874 invoked by alias); 4 Sep 2015 18:43:58 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 65827 invoked by uid 48); 4 Sep 2015 18:43:55 -0000
From: "pault at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/67429] [5/6 Regression] Missing part of error messages.
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:43:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pault at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status resolution
Message-ID: <bug-67429-4-0XxDcVm9Qt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67429-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67429-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg00378.txt.bz2
Content-length: 521
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idg429
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #18 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed on trunk and 5-branch. Thanks for raising the PR, Dominique, and thanks
for a quick fix, Manuel.
Paul
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-04 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-01 19:55 [Bug fortran/67429] New: " dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-09-01 20:00 ` [Bug fortran/67429] " kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-01 20:05 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-09-01 20:13 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2015-09-01 20:24 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-09-01 20:46 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2015-09-01 21:04 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-01 21:10 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-01 22:17 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-09-02 0:30 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-02 8:56 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-09-02 9:05 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-09-02 9:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-02 10:42 ` dominiq at lps dot ens.fr
2015-09-02 18:23 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-02 18:48 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-09-04 18:38 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-67429-4-AY6gZ1QgfI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).