From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-497078-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 55432 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2015 06:59:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 55362 invoked by uid 48); 13 Sep 2015 06:59:07 -0000
From: "Georg.Baum at post dot rwth-aachen.de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67557] Calling copy constructor of base class in constructor of derived class produces crashing code
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 06:59:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: Georg.Baum at post dot rwth-aachen.de
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67557-4-APiz12UMqD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67557-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67557-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg01056.txt.bz2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D67557

--- Comment #3 from Georg Baum <Georg.Baum at post dot rwth-aachen.de> ---
Can you please explain why =C2=A712.6.2 - 14 is applicable? I do not see an=
y member
function (virtual or not) being called on the partially constructed object.=
 I
still think that this is valid code with well defined behaviour.
>>From gcc-bugs-return-497079-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sun Sep 13 08:08:41 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-497079-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 100153 invoked by alias); 13 Sep 2015 08:08:40 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 98459 invoked by uid 48); 13 Sep 2015 08:08:36 -0000
From: "trippels at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/67557] Calling copy constructor of base class in constructor of derived class produces crashing code
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2015 08:08:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.1.1
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67557-4-uFZx0cStRL@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67557-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67557-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg01057.txt.bz2
Content-length: 210

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67557

--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf <trippels at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Well, the automatically generated copy constructor is a (special) member
function.