From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 43846 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2015 18:27:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 43818 invoked by uid 48); 26 Sep 2015 18:27:22 -0000 From: "daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/67617] Non-standard const requirements imposed on associative container comparison objects Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:27:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.8.4 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg02080.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D67617 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Kr=C3=BCgler --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > Both Clang/libc++ and MSVC/Dinkumware reject it for the same reason. I notice that the Dinkumware version associated with Visual Studio 2015 acc= epts the code. >>From gcc-bugs-return-498101-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Sat Sep 26 18:27:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 43041 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2015 18:27:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 42989 invoked by uid 48); 26 Sep 2015 18:26:59 -0000 From: "rbock at eudoxos dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/67319] Short-hand concepts for variadic member functions broken Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2015 18:27:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rbock at eudoxos dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-09/txt/msg02079.txt.bz2 Content-length: 383 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67319 --- Comment #1 from Roland B --- Using the terse notation works fine, btw: // ----------------------------- template concept bool Any() { return true; } struct my_struct { auto sample(Any... args) -> void; }; int main() { my_struct{}.sample(); } // -------------------------------