From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 50003 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2015 12:22:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 49973 invoked by uid 48); 8 Oct 2015 12:22:09 -0000 From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/67749] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-2.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made" Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 12:22:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00587.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D67749 --- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak from comment #3) > Please note that with -m32 we have additional testsuite FAIL [1] with > ifcvt-3.c: >=20 > FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-2.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made" > FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-3.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made" >=20 > [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-10/msg00812.html Yes, the ifcvt-3.c failure is PR 67462. But there it's a costs decision, and I'm inclined to skip that test for x86/-m32 >>From gcc-bugs-return-499033-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Oct 08 13:05:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 104543 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2015 13:05:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 101868 invoked by uid 48); 8 Oct 2015 13:04:57 -0000 From: "afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/67895] New: Wrong assembly: incorrect rounding/SAE specifier position Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 13:05:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 6.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: assemble-failure, wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status keywords bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter cc target_milestone cf_gcctarget Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00588.txt.bz2 Content-length: 1016 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67895 Bug ID: 67895 Summary: Wrong assembly: incorrect rounding/SAE specifier position Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: assemble-failure, wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: afomin.mailbox at gmail dot com CC: kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Target: i?86-*-*, x86_64-*-* Trying to assemble avx512dq-vrange*.c tests from gcc.target/i386 testsuite using GNU as v2.25 or higher results in a number of errors like: RC/SAE operand must follow immediate operands for `vrange*`. Same thing happens for avx512f-vcvt?si2*.c tests (but error message is slightly different): operand type mismatch for `vcvt?si2*'. The reason is that GCC emits an insn with rounding/SAE specifier in a wrong place.