From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 70554 invoked by alias); 3 Oct 2015 13:13:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 70524 invoked by uid 48); 3 Oct 2015 13:13:05 -0000 From: "mikael at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/67818] [5 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/alloc-comp-[23].f90 Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 13:13:00 -0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: mikael at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00245.txt.bz2 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67818 --- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #3) > So the question is whether r222477 should be backported, or r228361 reverted. I have looked at the r222477 patch more in details, and it seems reasonable after all. Moreover, Paul suggested a backport when he approved it. So I think I'll go the backport route. HJL, can you confirm it fixes the problem?