public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug middle-end/67821] New: [gcc 5 regression] ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_range_info
@ 2015-10-02 16:56 sss@li-snyder.org
  2015-10-02 17:22 ` [Bug middle-end/67821] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (6 more replies)
  0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: sss@li-snyder.org @ 2015-10-02 16:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67821

            Bug ID: 67821
           Summary: [gcc 5 regression] ICE in
                    duplicate_ssa_name_range_info
           Product: gcc
           Version: 5.3.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: middle-end
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: sss@li-snyder.org
  Target Milestone: ---

Created attachment 36438
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36438&action=edit
test case

hi -

I'm testing gcc from the gcc-5-branch svn branch.
Using the version as of 2 oct 2015 (svn rev 228385), i get an ICE compiling
the attached if -O2 is used.  (Reduced from core/clib/src/Demangle.c
in root 6.02.08, which appears itself to have been copied from libiberty.)

$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/gcc/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.2.1/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: /home/sss/gcc/gcc/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc
--enable-threads=posix --enable-long-long --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.2.1 20151002 (GCC) 
$ gcc -c -O2 x.c
x.c: In function ‘demangle_qualified’:
x.c:6:9: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘isdigit’
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
    if (!isdigit (*p))
         ^
x.c:1:5: internal compiler error: in duplicate_ssa_name_range_info, at
tree-ssanames.c:506
 int demangle_qualified (const char* mangled)
     ^
0xb29f14 duplicate_ssa_name_range_info(tree_node*, value_range_type,
range_info_def*)
        /home/sss/gcc/gcc/gcc/tree-ssanames.c:506
0xacdff3 eliminate_dom_walker::before_dom_children(basic_block_def*)
        /home/sss/gcc/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c:4151
0xe9d5e1 dom_walker::walk(basic_block_def*)
        /home/sss/gcc/gcc/gcc/domwalk.c:188
0xacc23b eliminate
        /home/sss/gcc/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c:4540
0xad405e execute
        /home/sss/gcc/gcc/gcc/tree-ssa-pre.c:4894
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
$ 


tree-ssanames.c:506 is this line:

  gcc_assert (!SSA_NAME_ANTI_RANGE_P (name));

The last update i did from gcc-5-branch was about a month ago,
and i did not see this crash with that version.

thanks,
sss
>From gcc-bugs-return-498635-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Oct 02 16:58:30 2015
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-498635-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 93134 invoked by alias); 2 Oct 2015 16:58:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 90902 invoked by uid 48); 2 Oct 2015 16:58:26 -0000
From: "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/67818] [5 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.fortran/alloc-comp-[23].f90
Date: Fri, 02 Oct 2015 16:58:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.3.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 5.3
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-67818-4-enbuzLCWYT@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-67818-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-67818-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2015-10/txt/msg00190.txt.bz2
Content-length: 445

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idg818

--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
Program received signal SIGSEGV: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference.

Backtrace for this error:
#0  0xF769EB7E
#1  0xF769DC7E
#2  0xF7798BDF
#3  0x8053299 in foo.3532._omp_fn.2 at alloc-comp-2.f90:?
#4  0xF760186E
#5  0xF75DD34F
#6  0xF7502A4D
#7  0xFFFFFFFF
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/alloc-comp-2.f90   -O0  execution test


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-10-05 18:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-10-02 16:56 [Bug middle-end/67821] New: [gcc 5 regression] ICE in duplicate_ssa_name_range_info sss@li-snyder.org
2015-10-02 17:22 ` [Bug middle-end/67821] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-02 17:22 ` [Bug middle-end/67821] [5/6 Regression] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-03  1:27 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-05 12:03 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-05 15:28 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-05 18:39 ` [Bug middle-end/67821] [5 " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-10-05 18:40 ` mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).